amoghrajesh opened a new pull request, #71078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/71078

    <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
         https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing!
   
   Please provide above a brief description of the changes made in this pull 
request.
   Write a good git commit message following this guide: 
https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   
   Please make sure that your code changes are covered with tests.
   And in case of new features or big changes remember to adjust the 
documentation.
   
   For user-facing UI changes, please attach before/after screenshots (or a 
short
   screen recording) so reviewers can assess the visual impact.
   
   Feel free to ping (in general) for the review if you do not see reaction for 
a few days
   (72 Hours is the minimum reaction time you can expect from volunteers) - we 
sometimes miss notifications.
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   * closes: #ISSUE
   * related: #ISSUE
   -->
   
   ---
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR, 
please
   change below checkbox to `[X]` followed by the name of the tool, uncomment 
the "Generated-by".
   -->
   
   - [ ] Yes (please specify the tool below)
   
   <!--
   Generated-by: [Tool Name] following [the 
guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#gen-ai-assisted-contributions)
   -->
   
   Related to (#70878), (#70876), (#70899), (#70869), (#70877), (#70736)
   
   ## Summary
   
   - Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, AWS SSM, GCP Secret Manager, and 
Yandex Lockbox all refuse to look up any id that contains the team-namespace 
separator, to avoid ambiguity with a team-scoped secret name.
   - This runs even when multi-team mode is off, which is the default for 
almost every deployment. Without multi-team mode, no team-scoped secret can 
exist, so there's no ambiguity to protect against - it just silently breaks 
ordinary ids
   - On Azure specifically, an id is compared against its underscore-to-dash 
normalized form, so an ordinary
   connection id containing a double underscore (e.g. aws__prod) was silently 
refused as if it were a missing secret: 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/providers/microsoft/azure/src/airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/secrets/key_vault.py#L230-L251
   
   Trying to gate this by only run the check when `[core] multi_team` is 
enabled, same as Airflow already does at the model layer.
   
   
   ---
   
   * Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits 
become permanently public when merged.
   * For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   * When adding dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   * For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: 
`{pr_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[airflow-core/newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/newsfragments).
 You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you 
know the PR number.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to