KidAmnesiac1 opened a new pull request, #72200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/72200

   The scheduler Deployment copies the executor value into a pod label and 
sanitises "," and ":" on the way through. Multi-team executor config uses ";" 
and "=" as its separators, and neither is legal in a Kubernetes label value, so 
a chart configured the documented multi-team way renders a label the API server 
rejects and the deploy fails outright.
   
   Why this is worth fixing rather than working around: multi-team executors 
are what the edge worker's --team-name flag depends on. EdgeExecutor stamps 
each edge_job row with its executor's team, and a worker started with 
--team-name only picks up jobs whose team matches. Without a per-team executor 
entry the jobs get stamped NULL, the worker sits there reporting it has no 
work, and the tasks stay queued.
   
   There isn't a good way around it from values.yaml. Quoting doesn't help, 
because the restriction is on the characters in the label rather than on the 
YAML. Setting config.core.executor instead is refused by the check in 
NOTES.txt. Overriding the label through .Values.labels does render, but it 
stamps the label on every object in the chart and breaks the migrations Job, 
whose pod template can't be changed in place.
   
   Sanitising ";" and "=" alongside the separators the chart already handles 
keeps the label legal while airflow.cfg still gets the real value.
   
    <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
         https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing!
   
   Please provide above a brief description of the changes made in this pull 
request.
   Write a good git commit message following this guide: 
https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   
   Please make sure that your code changes are covered with tests.
   And in case of new features or big changes remember to adjust the 
documentation.
   
   For user-facing UI changes, please attach before/after screenshots (or a 
short
   screen recording) so reviewers can assess the visual impact.
   
   Feel free to ping (in general) for the review if you do not see reaction for 
a few days
   (72 Hours is the minimum reaction time you can expect from volunteers) - we 
sometimes miss notifications.
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   * closes: #ISSUE
   * related: #ISSUE
   -->
   
   ---
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR, 
please
   change below checkbox to `[X]` followed by the name of the tool, uncomment 
the "Generated-by".
   -->
   
   - [ X] Yes Claude Opus 5
   
   <!--
   Generated-by: [Tool Name] following [the 
guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#gen-ai-assisted-contributions)
   -->
   
   ---
   
   * Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits 
become permanently public when merged.
   * For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   * When adding dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   * For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: 
`{pr_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[airflow-core/newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/newsfragments).
 You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you 
know the PR number.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to