kaxil opened a new pull request, #73553:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/73553

   Follow-up to #73508, which added `ChainRetryPolicy` to the Task SDK in 
Airflow 3.4. Retry policies themselves arrived in 3.3, so a Dag on 3.3 can run 
a chain as long as the class comes from somewhere. This makes 
`airflow.providers.common.compat.sdk` that place: where the SDK has the class 
(3.4 and later) the compat module returns the SDK class, on 3.3 a copy in this 
provider stands in for it, and on 3.2 and below the name is absent, as retry 
policies are.
   
   ```python
   from airflow.providers.common.compat.sdk import ChainRetryPolicy, 
ExceptionRetryPolicy, RetryAction, RetryRule
   ```
   
   The other retry policy names (`RetryPolicy`, `RetryDecision`, `RetryAction`, 
`RetryRule`, `ExceptionRetryPolicy`) are exported from the same module, so a 
chain is one import line. Those map straight to the SDK on every version that 
has them.
   
   The tests ran on `main` (Airflow 3.4.0), where compat resolves to the SDK 
class, and against a released Airflow 3.3.2 with Task SDK 1.3.2 and this 
provider installed from a wheel, where compat resolves to the copy. The 
behaviour tests import the copy directly and one drives it through the worker's 
own `_evaluate_retry_policy`, so both run on both versions.
   
   ## Design rationale
   
   **A copy in compat, rather than raising the Common AI floor to 3.4.** Common 
AI floors `apache-airflow>=3.0.0`; requiring 3.4 for one class would drop 3.0 
to 3.3 for the whole provider, and it would still leave every other Dag author 
on 3.3 without the chain. Vendoring the class privately inside Common AI would 
serve one consumer. The compat provider exists for this gap and already carries 
class copies (the lineage entities) and polyfills, so a copy here serves any 
Dag on 3.3 through one import line. The cost is that the copy stays in the 
package until 3.3 leaves compat's support window, which is why the tests 
compare the source of both classes and fail on drift.
   
   **Resolved through the existing lazy import map, not a version gate at 
import time.** The compat sdk module resolves names on first access. Adding map 
entries means importing `airflow.providers.common.compat.sdk` gains no new 
eager import, and the SDK path is listed first, so wherever the SDK has the 
class the copy is never imported. The copy imports `RetryPolicy`, 
`RetryDecision` and `RetryAction` from the SDK rather than duplicating them, so 
it produces SDK decisions and is a subclass of the SDK base; the worker only 
calls `evaluate` and only a `has_retry_policy` flag is serialized, so nothing 
can tell the two classes apart.
   
   **Gated on 3.3 like the other 3-only names.** On Airflow 2 and on 3.0 to 3.2 
the import raises `ImportError`, the way `DownstreamTasksSkipped` does there. A 
provider that supports those versions and imports any of the six names at 
module level has to guard the import, as Common AI already does for its SDK 
retry imports.
   
   The Common AI retry guide will point 3.3 users at this import once it is in 
a compat release.
   
   ---
   
   * Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits 
become permanently public when merged.
   * For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   * When adding dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   * For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: 
`{pr_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[airflow-core/newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/newsfragments).
 You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you 
know the PR number.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to