dabla commented on PR #62922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/62922#issuecomment-5865250109

   Three more commits, following up on the earlier remark about suffixing on 
the pull side and a gap it uncovered on the state store:
   
   - f5deadde98 **Give each iteration its own task state store keys, as for 
XComs.** Every iteration runs under the same task instance, so a key one 
iteration stored through `context["task_state_store"]` was shared with its 
siblings, last writer wins. `IndexedTaskStateStoreAccessor` decorates the 
parent's accessor and suffixes keys with the index on get/set/delete, sync and 
async, the same rule `IndexedTaskInstance.xcom_push` applies to XComs. 
`clear()` is refused inside an iteration. The operator's own checkpoints keep 
their unsuffixed `_iterable_<index>` keys in the parent's store. Tested on the 
accessor, on `IndexedTaskInstance`, and end to end with a sync and an async 
operator that keep state.
   - 55c48ed508 **Build the sub-task's context in the runner.** The clone of 
the parent's context with the sub-task's ti, state store view and outlet events 
was built twice in the operator; it now lives in one place next to the task 
instance it belongs to, and the two `_run_operator` methods are gone.
   - 7dd2accadb **Rename `TaskExecutor` to `IndexedTaskRunner`.** It read like 
one of Airflow's executors; it runs one index of an iterated task, so it is 
named after `IndexedTaskInstance`.
   
   The four stacked PRs are restacked on top; each still one commit.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to