PrakshiGoyal10 commented on code in PR #69998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/69998#discussion_r4451887559


##########
providers/databricks/src/airflow/providers/databricks/plugins/databricks_workflow.py:
##########
@@ -515,6 +583,304 @@ def get_link(  # type: ignore[override]  # Signature 
intentionally kept this way
         return url_for("RepairDatabricksTasks.repair", **query_params)
 
 
+# Airflow-3 repair backend. Flask-AppBuilder was dropped in Airflow 3, so the 
repair
+# action is re-implemented as a FastAPI sub-application mounted on the API 
server. The workflow
+# tasks store the repair links pointing at it in XCom 
(``store_databricks_repair_link``).
+REPAIR_URL_PREFIX = "/databricks/workflow/repair"
+
+
+def _build_repair_url(
+    dag_id: str,
+    run_id: str,
+    launch_task_id: str,
+    *,
+    repair_all: bool = False,
+    task_id: str | None = None,
+) -> str:
+    """
+    Build the URL to the Airflow-3 FastAPI repair confirmation page for a 
workflow run.
+
+    The URL carries only Airflow identifiers: the run's launch ``task_id`` 
(from which the
+    endpoint reads the trusted ``WorkflowRunMetadata`` XCom) and, for a 
single-task repair, the
+    target ``task_id``. The Databricks connection, run id, and task keys are 
never placed in the
+    link — the endpoint derives them server-side, so the request cannot point 
the repair at an
+    arbitrary connection or Databricks run.
+
+    Called on the worker at task execution, so the path prefix comes from the 
worker's
+    ``[api] base_url``.
+    """
+    query: dict[str, Any] = {"launch_task_id": launch_task_id}
+    if repair_all:
+        query["repair_all"] = "true"
+    if task_id:
+        query["task_id"] = task_id
+
+    # Same-site relative path only. Using the full ``[api] base_url`` (scheme 
+ host) would make
+    # the confirmation POST cross-origin when that setting names a different 
domain than the UI,
+    # and SameSite=Lax would then withhold the auth cookie.
+    return (
+        f"{_api_root_path()}{REPAIR_URL_PREFIX}/{quote(dag_id, safe='')}/"
+        f"{quote(run_id, safe='')}?{urlencode(query)}"
+    )
+
+
+def _api_root_path() -> str:
+    """Path prefix from ``[api] base_url``, or empty when the API is mounted 
at the origin root."""
+    return urlsplit(conf.get("api", "base_url", fallback="") or 
"").path.rstrip("/")
+
+
+def _ui_run_path(dag_id: str, run_id: str) -> str:
+    """Same-site relative path to the Dag run in the UI, including the API 
root path if set."""
+    return f"{_api_root_path()}/dags/{quote(dag_id, 
safe='')}/runs/{quote(run_id, safe='')}"
+
+
+if AIRFLOW_V_3_1_1_PLUS:
+    from fastapi import Depends, FastAPI, HTTPException
+    from fastapi.responses import HTMLResponse, RedirectResponse
+    from markupsafe import escape
+
+    from airflow.api_fastapi.auth.managers.models.resource_details import 
DagAccessEntity
+    from airflow.api_fastapi.core_api.security import requires_access_dag
+
+    repair_app = FastAPI(
+        title="Databricks Workflow Repair",
+        description="Repair failed tasks of a Databricks workflow run from 
Airflow.",
+    )
+
+    # Authenticate (bearer header or the UI's ``_token`` cookie) and authorize 
Dag-run edit access
+    # through the API server's own dependency, rather than parsing the request 
or assuming how the
+    # auth manager maps requests to users. ``requires_access_dag`` reads the 
``dag_id`` path param
+    # and calls the auth manager; ``get_user`` behind it already honours both 
the bearer header and
+    # the cookie, so a repair link clicked in the browser is authorized. Bound 
to a module-level
+    # name so tests can override just this dependency.
+    _require_dag_run_edit = requires_access_dag(method="PUT", 
access_entity=DagAccessEntity.RUN)
+
+    def _task_id_to_key(dag_id: str, task_id: str, task_key_map: dict[str, 
str]) -> str:
+        """
+        Resolve a task's Databricks ``task_key`` from the launch task's 
trusted key map.
+
+        An explicit ``databricks_task_key`` does not survive Dag 
serialization, so the serialized
+        task can't be trusted to reproduce it. The launch task captured the 
real keys from the live
+        operators into ``task_key_map``. Runs launched before that map existed 
fall back to the
+        operator's default derivation, ``md5(dag_id__task_id)`` — correct for 
any task that did not
+        set an explicit key (the common case).
+        """
+        mapped = task_key_map.get(task_id)
+        if mapped:
+            return mapped
+        import hashlib
+
+        return hashlib.md5(f"{dag_id}__{task_id}".encode()).hexdigest()
+
+    def _read_launch_metadata(dag_id: str, run_id: str, launch_task_id: str, 
session) -> Any:

Review Comment:
   Agreed. I added a note to `docs/operators/workflow.rst`. On Airflow 3 the 
repair endpoint reads the launch task's XCom result straight from the metadata 
database, so repair isn't supported when a custom XCom backend stores values 
outside it.
   
   ---
   Drafted-by: Claude Code (Opus 5.5); reviewed by @PrakshiGoyal10 before 
posting



##########
providers/databricks/src/airflow/providers/databricks/plugins/databricks_workflow.py:
##########
@@ -515,6 +583,304 @@ def get_link(  # type: ignore[override]  # Signature 
intentionally kept this way
         return url_for("RepairDatabricksTasks.repair", **query_params)
 
 
+# Airflow-3 repair backend. Flask-AppBuilder was dropped in Airflow 3, so the 
repair
+# action is re-implemented as a FastAPI sub-application mounted on the API 
server. The workflow
+# tasks store the repair links pointing at it in XCom 
(``store_databricks_repair_link``).
+REPAIR_URL_PREFIX = "/databricks/workflow/repair"
+
+
+def _build_repair_url(
+    dag_id: str,
+    run_id: str,
+    launch_task_id: str,
+    *,
+    repair_all: bool = False,
+    task_id: str | None = None,
+) -> str:
+    """
+    Build the URL to the Airflow-3 FastAPI repair confirmation page for a 
workflow run.
+
+    The URL carries only Airflow identifiers: the run's launch ``task_id`` 
(from which the
+    endpoint reads the trusted ``WorkflowRunMetadata`` XCom) and, for a 
single-task repair, the
+    target ``task_id``. The Databricks connection, run id, and task keys are 
never placed in the
+    link — the endpoint derives them server-side, so the request cannot point 
the repair at an
+    arbitrary connection or Databricks run.
+
+    Called on the worker at task execution, so the path prefix comes from the 
worker's
+    ``[api] base_url``.
+    """
+    query: dict[str, Any] = {"launch_task_id": launch_task_id}
+    if repair_all:
+        query["repair_all"] = "true"
+    if task_id:
+        query["task_id"] = task_id
+
+    # Same-site relative path only. Using the full ``[api] base_url`` (scheme 
+ host) would make
+    # the confirmation POST cross-origin when that setting names a different 
domain than the UI,
+    # and SameSite=Lax would then withhold the auth cookie.
+    return (
+        f"{_api_root_path()}{REPAIR_URL_PREFIX}/{quote(dag_id, safe='')}/"
+        f"{quote(run_id, safe='')}?{urlencode(query)}"
+    )
+
+
+def _api_root_path() -> str:
+    """Path prefix from ``[api] base_url``, or empty when the API is mounted 
at the origin root."""
+    return urlsplit(conf.get("api", "base_url", fallback="") or 
"").path.rstrip("/")
+
+
+def _ui_run_path(dag_id: str, run_id: str) -> str:
+    """Same-site relative path to the Dag run in the UI, including the API 
root path if set."""
+    return f"{_api_root_path()}/dags/{quote(dag_id, 
safe='')}/runs/{quote(run_id, safe='')}"
+
+
+if AIRFLOW_V_3_1_1_PLUS:
+    from fastapi import Depends, FastAPI, HTTPException
+    from fastapi.responses import HTMLResponse, RedirectResponse
+    from markupsafe import escape
+
+    from airflow.api_fastapi.auth.managers.models.resource_details import 
DagAccessEntity
+    from airflow.api_fastapi.core_api.security import requires_access_dag
+
+    repair_app = FastAPI(
+        title="Databricks Workflow Repair",
+        description="Repair failed tasks of a Databricks workflow run from 
Airflow.",
+    )
+
+    # Authenticate (bearer header or the UI's ``_token`` cookie) and authorize 
Dag-run edit access
+    # through the API server's own dependency, rather than parsing the request 
or assuming how the
+    # auth manager maps requests to users. ``requires_access_dag`` reads the 
``dag_id`` path param
+    # and calls the auth manager; ``get_user`` behind it already honours both 
the bearer header and
+    # the cookie, so a repair link clicked in the browser is authorized. Bound 
to a module-level
+    # name so tests can override just this dependency.
+    _require_dag_run_edit = requires_access_dag(method="PUT", 
access_entity=DagAccessEntity.RUN)
+
+    def _task_id_to_key(dag_id: str, task_id: str, task_key_map: dict[str, 
str]) -> str:
+        """
+        Resolve a task's Databricks ``task_key`` from the launch task's 
trusted key map.
+
+        An explicit ``databricks_task_key`` does not survive Dag 
serialization, so the serialized
+        task can't be trusted to reproduce it. The launch task captured the 
real keys from the live
+        operators into ``task_key_map``. Runs launched before that map existed 
fall back to the
+        operator's default derivation, ``md5(dag_id__task_id)`` — correct for 
any task that did not
+        set an explicit key (the common case).
+        """
+        mapped = task_key_map.get(task_id)
+        if mapped:
+            return mapped
+        import hashlib
+
+        return hashlib.md5(f"{dag_id}__{task_id}".encode()).hexdigest()
+
+    def _read_launch_metadata(dag_id: str, run_id: str, launch_task_id: str, 
session) -> Any:
+        """
+        Read the launch task's trusted ``WorkflowRunMetadata`` XCom (conn_id, 
job_id, run_id).
+
+        The Databricks connection and run id come from here — never from the 
request — so a crafted
+        link cannot redirect the repair at an arbitrary connection or 
Databricks run.
+        """
+        from airflow.models.xcom import XComModel
+        from airflow.providers.databricks.operators.databricks_workflow import 
WorkflowRunMetadata
+
+        result = session.scalars(
+            XComModel.get_many(
+                run_id=run_id,
+                key="return_value",
+                task_ids=launch_task_id,
+                dag_ids=dag_id,
+                limit=1,
+            )
+        ).first()
+        if result is None:
+            raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Databricks workflow 
run metadata not found.")
+        return WorkflowRunMetadata(**XComModel.deserialize_value(result))
+
+    def _clear_repaired_and_downstream(
+        dag, run_id: str, task_ids: list[str], session, logger: logging.Logger
+    ) -> None:
+        """
+        Clear the repaired tasks and their downstream task instances for this 
run.
+
+        Expands to downstream with ``dag.partial_subset`` and clears with 
``dag.clear``, as the core
+        clear-task-instances route does, so the upstream-failed dependents 
resume once the repaired
+        Databricks sub-runs succeed — without clearing the whole Dag. 
``find_relevant_relatives``,
+        which newer core uses for this, does not exist on Airflow 3.1.
+        """
+        if not task_ids:
+            return
+        to_clear: set[str] = set(task_ids)
+        downstream = dag.partial_subset(
+            task_ids=task_ids, include_downstream=True, 
include_upstream=False, exclude_original=True
+        )
+        to_clear.update(downstream.task_dict)
+        logger.info("Clearing %s task(s) and downstream after Databricks 
repair: %s", len(task_ids), to_clear)
+        dag.clear(task_ids=list(to_clear), run_id=run_id, session=session)
+
+    # Plain-CSS approximation of the Airflow UI, so the page does not look out 
of place next to it.
+    # No JavaScript: the repair runs only when the user submits the form.
+    _CONFIRMATION_PAGE_STYLE = """
+    :root { color-scheme: light dark; --bg: #f4f6f8; --card: #ffffff; --text: 
#1a202c;
+      --muted: #4a5568; --border: #e2e8f0; --primary: #017cee; 
--primary-hover: #0165c3; }
+    @media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) { :root { --bg: #0f1520; --card: 
#1a2230;
+      --text: #e2e8f0; --muted: #a0aec0; --border: #2d3748; --primary: #3b9cff;
+      --primary-hover: #63b0ff; } }
+    body { margin: 0; min-height: 100vh; display: flex; align-items: center; 
justify-content: center;
+      background: var(--bg); color: var(--text);
+      font: 15px/1.5 system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, sans-serif; 
}
+    .card { width: min(560px, calc(100vw - 32px)); background: var(--card);
+      border: 1px solid var(--border); border-radius: 12px; padding: 28px 32px;
+      box-shadow: 0 4px 16px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.08); }
+    h1 { font-size: 20px; margin: 0 0 20px; }
+    dl { display: grid; grid-template-columns: max-content 1fr; gap: 6px 16px; 
margin: 0 0 20px; }
+    dt { color: var(--muted); }
+    dd { margin: 0; font-family: ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, 
monospace; word-break: break-all; }
+    p { margin: 0 0 24px; }
+    .actions { display: flex; gap: 12px; justify-content: flex-end; 
align-items: center; }
+    button, .cancel { font: inherit; border-radius: 6px; padding: 8px 18px; 
cursor: pointer;
+      text-decoration: none; }
+    button { background: var(--primary); color: #fff; border: 1px solid 
var(--primary); }
+    button:hover { background: var(--primary-hover); }
+    .cancel { color: var(--text); border: 1px solid var(--border); }
+    .cancel:hover { background: var(--bg); }
+    """
+
+    def _repair_confirmation_page(
+        dag_id: str, run_id: str, action: str, summary: str, cancel_url: str
+    ) -> HTMLResponse:
+        """Render the read-only confirmation page whose form issues the 
state-changing POST."""
+        return HTMLResponse(

Review Comment:
   Done. The page is now a `textwrap.dedent("""...""")` template, filled with 
`str.format`. The multi-line stylesheet goes in after the dedent so it doesn't 
affect it, and every request-derived value is still `escape()`d.
   
   ---
   Drafted-by: Claude Code (Opus 5.5); reviewed by @PrakshiGoyal10 before 
posting



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to