potiuk commented on pull request #8807:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8807#issuecomment-629042359


   Hey @ashb @kaxil @mik-laj @feluelle . I think I have finally solved all the 
small quirks - including some extras (like apache-beam) messing with the 
installation.
   
   This one contains all the fixes discussed above plus:
   
   * we do not have to modify setup_backport_packages.py to change version or 
add rc1/rc2. Package version is now the same as the generated readme version 
and you can add `--version-suffix rc1` manually when preparing packages. This 
way from exactly the same commit we can generate rc1/rc2 etc. without having to 
modify anything (we could use the same technique to generate main airflow 
package BTW).
   
   * Documentation in BACKPORT_PACKAGES.md is updated to include this 
simplified process
   
   * we excluded some of the google packages (bigquery ones) from the google 
provider release. We (@turbaszek ) are running now big rewrite of the bigquery 
operators and they will not be backwards compatible, so we think it is bettter 
to exclude them from this release (we will release this and some new operators 
in a few weeks - at the same time testing the single-package releases.
   
   * When you prepare packages - by default when you do not provide the date, 
by default it is +5 days - this is mostly used in the CI job. The CI job will 
prepare (and upload to files.io) readmes for all packages - this way we can see 
the release notes for packages that need to be released. I will improve it 
further to only show and summarize the packages that "need release" - i.e. 
those that had some changes since the last release (but I will add it later). I 
want to have a single page/report showing - "those are the changed backport 
packages - maybe we should release some of them"?
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to