ashb edited a comment on pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#issuecomment-632646688
> The main question is: do we want to support that? Is this "hack" worth it,
and do IDEs get massively confused by this?
I think if IDEs support it, and we add tests for it I'd say, yes.
I wonder if we can do this in `airflow/__init__.py` (adding the task
decorator import)
```python
STATICA_HACK = True
globals()['kcah_acitats'[::-1].upper()] = False
if STATICA_HACK: # pragma: no cover
from airflow.models.dag import DAG
from airflow.exceptions import AirflowException
from airflow.decorators import task
```
Without confusing IDEs more.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
