[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17139294#comment-17139294
]
Kamil Bregula commented on AIRFLOW-6648:
----------------------------------------
Only people with write access to the repository must have a CLA Most
contributors do not need CLA
> Timeout Feature - Provided statistical solution to long running/stuck jobs
> and take appropriate actions
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-6648
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6648
> Project: Apache Airflow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: aws, DAG, database, operators
> Affects Versions: 1.10.0
> Environment: AWS Linux AMI - Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS (GNU/Linux
> 4.15.0-1027-aws x86_64)
> Reporter: Golokesh Patra
> Assignee: Golokesh Patra
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: image-2020-01-27-17-07-51-822.png,
> image-2020-01-27-17-08-09-867.png, image-2020-01-27-17-08-33-088.png,
> image-2020-01-27-17-22-07-433.png, image2019-3-25_12-33-57.png
>
> Original Estimate: 336h
> Remaining Estimate: 336h
>
> Sometimes, across different type of tasks/jobs ,
> one might encounter issues where airflow jobs/tasks get stuck while they are
> in running state.
> Such issues will cause - Pipeline being stuck for no reason stalling other
> jobs/tasks which will be a disaster when such issues happen on Production.
> This particular improvement aims to not only improve upon the TIMEOUT logic
> already in airflow, but to make it more functional and automated.
> *Diagrammatically Explanation of the solution -*
> !image-2020-01-27-17-22-07-433.png!
> *Detailed Theoretical Explanation -*
> With increasing Data & Complexity of tasks/job , besides the increasing load,
> the chances of memory leaks/stuck jobs/some infrastructural issues etc may
> occur thereby creating some unwanted results.
> Maybe on some day there was more data which resulted in a steep jump in the
> duration of the job; otherwise, the growth is expected to be gradual.
> And sometimes, the Jobs get stuck because of various issues and often
> requires termination followed by a restart.
> So, we are trying to make a logic which will automatically decide whether to
> * _terminate the Job_
> * _Terminate and Restart_
> * _Terminate and Mark as a failure so that downstream jobs don't get
> triggered._
> * _Take no action and inform DevOps regarding the issue ( Manual Action )_
> So, I just want to know, statistically, what will be the effective way to
> achieve the above outcomes.
> Lets Consider 2 Jobs X & Y.
> Jobs related Info -
> !image-2020-01-27-17-07-51-822.png!
> !image-2020-01-27-17-08-09-867.png!
> Then I was thinking of having a New Table which would be structured as -
> +Derived table-+
> !image-2020-01-27-17-08-33-088.png!
> ( The above Example is theoretical and actual implementation might differ )
> *LIMITATION -*
> # For now , we have only tested the above on EMR ( Personal Usecase )
> # Testing Pending for Databricks. ( Personal Usecase )
> Please do suggest any other services where this needs/can be used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
