mik-laj opened a new pull request #9758:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9758


   I propose this change for two reasons.
   - include with links is relatively problematic because include causes links 
to be resolved from the context of the wrong file. This is resolved in the 
context of the parent file, not in the context of the current file. This limits 
the reuse of the file.
   - The use of absolute paths will allow easier refactorization, because I 
would like to divide these sections into several smaller ones, e.g. 
transfer/service operators, and then grouping by the department.
   
   ---
   Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
   
   - [X] Description above provides context of the change
   - [X] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation changes)
   - [X] Target Github ISSUE in description if exists
   - [X] Commits follow "[How to write a good git commit 
message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)"
   - [X] Relevant documentation is updated including usage instructions.
   - [X] I will engage committers as explained in [Contribution Workflow 
Example](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#contribution-workflow-example).
   
   ---
   In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvements+Proposals))
 is needed.
   In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party 
License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in 
[UPDATING.md](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/UPDATING.md).
   Read the [Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)
 for more information.
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to