feluelle commented on a change in pull request #9394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9394#discussion_r455748785



##########
File path: tests/operators/test_python.py
##########
@@ -1222,23 +1230,42 @@ def f(templates_dict):
         self._run_as_operator(f, templates_dict={'ds': '{{ ds }}'})
 
     def test_airflow_context(self):
-        def f(**context):
-            # not serializable
-            assert 'var' not in context
-            assert 'task_instance' not in context
-            assert 'ti' not in context
-            # require airflow
-            assert 'conf' in context
-            assert 'dag' in context
-            assert 'dag_run' in context
-            assert 'macros' in context
-            assert 'task' in context
-            # require airflow or pendulum
-            assert 'execution_date' in context
-            assert 'next_execution_date' in context
-            assert 'prev_execution_date' in context
-            assert 'prev_execution_date_success' in context
-            assert 'prev_start_date_success' in context
+        def f(
+            # basic
+            ds_nodash,
+            inlets,
+            next_ds,
+            next_ds_nodash,
+            outlets,
+            params,
+            prev_ds,
+            prev_ds_nodash,
+            run_id,
+            task_instance_key_str,
+            test_mode,
+            tomorrow_ds,
+            tomorrow_ds_nodash,
+            ts,
+            ts_nodash,
+            ts_nodash_with_tz,
+            yesterday_ds,
+            yesterday_ds_nodash,
+            # pendulum-specific
+            execution_date,
+            next_execution_date,
+            prev_execution_date,
+            prev_execution_date_success,
+            prev_start_date_success,
+            # airflow-specific
+            macros,
+            conf,
+            dag,
+            dag_run,
+            task,
+            # other
+            **context
+        ):  # pylint: 
disable=unused-argument,too-many-arguments,too-many-locals
+            pass

Review comment:
       Good point, but I think this would rather make it more complex.. of 
course we could save a few lines but.. as it is right now it is pretty straight 
forward to see what is going on. Using `parameterized.expand` would make it 
more complex which is not worth the lines we would save in my opinion.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to