[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15876942#comment-15876942
 ] 

Daniel Huang commented on AIRFLOW-872:
--------------------------------------

I hit this as well with the LatestOnlyOperator (very similar to 
ShortCircuitOperator, it also sets its direct downstream tasks to SKIPPED) when 
there are more than one task downstream from the latest only task.

I believe this 
[block](https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/50702d06187035c99e51ea936c756c00332c4a4a/airflow/models.py#L4034)
 is being hit and setting the dag to failed prematurely. When I commented it 
out as a temporary workaround, the remaining tasks get set to skipped correctly 
and the dag ends in success.

> Tasks are not skipping correctly
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRFLOW-872
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-872
>             Project: Apache Airflow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cli, DagRun, webserver
>    Affects Versions: Airflow 1.8
>         Environment: docker-compose using docker-compose-LocalExecutor.yml  
> on this fork/branch 
> https://github.com/fdm1/docker-airflow/tree/v1-8-not-skipping
>            Reporter: Frank Massi
>         Attachments: Screen Shot 2017-02-13 at 1.09.35 PM.png, Screen Shot 
> 2017-02-13 at 1.11.09 PM.png, Screen Shot 2017-02-13 at 1.11.15 PM.png, 
> Screen Shot 2017-02-13 at 1.13.13 PM.png
>
>
> When using the BranchPythonOperator or ShortCircuitOperator to make Dags 
> idempotent, if running the Dag after a successful DagRun and clearing the 
> initial task, the second task skips and then the Dag enters a failed state, 
> as opposed to skipping all remaining tasks and marking the Dag successful.
> Steps to reproduce are outlined here: 
> https://github.com/fdm1/docker-airflow/blob/v1-8-not-skipping/dags/test_clear_bug.py#L4-L9
> In 1.7.1.3, the tasks do skip correctly, so this appears to be a new bug.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to