wardlican opened a new issue, #3762: URL: https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/3762
### Search before asking - [x] I have searched in the [issues](https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues?q=is%3Aissue) and found no similar issues. ### Description Solution Overview - Added a new SPI factory interface, TableServiceProvider (based on ServiceLoader). - Provides a default implementation, DefaultTableServiceProvider, and registers it in META-INF/services. - Added a new configuration option, TABLE_SERVICE_IMPL (string), with two supported syntaxes: -- Specify the provider name (e.g., default) -- Specify the implementation class name (e.g., org.apache.amoro.server.table.DefaultTableService) - Creates a TableService in the AmoroServiceContainer using a configuration-based loader method. - Retains the existing default behavior: Falling back to DefaultTableService when not configured. ### Parent issue https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/3670 ### Are you willing to submit PR? - [x] Yes I am willing to submit a PR! ### Code of Conduct - [x] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
