wardlican commented on PR #3764: URL: https://github.com/apache/amoro/pull/3764#issuecomment-3284193114
> > To distinguish between the master-slave mode and the master-slave mode, the newly added master-slave mode should not affect the original logic. The master-slave mode will make more logical changes in TableServcie. > > Will the two implementations be merged in the future? In the long run, the horizontally-scalable version is likely to become the default. If we do expect a single unified implementation eventually, we could simply switch between the two code paths with a config flag today instead of introducing a full SPI framework. After all, TableService is not intended to be opened up for third-party plug-ins down the road. > > WDYT @zhoujinsong @Aireed Yes, the design here needs to decide whether to implement compatible logic through configuration in DefaultTableService. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
