[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aviem Zur updated BEAM-147:
---------------------------
    Description: 
The existing Aggregators are confusing both because of their name and because 
they serve multiple purposes.

Previous discussions around Aggregators/metrics/etc:
[Discussion on user 
list|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-beam-user/201603.mbox/browser]
 
[Discussion on dev 
list|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-beam-dev/201603.mbox/browser]
 
Exact name still being bikeshedded.

[Design document|http://s.apache.org/beam-metrics-api]

  was:
The existing Aggregators are confusing both because of their name and because 
they serve multiple purposes.

Previous discussions around Aggregators/metrics/etc.
See discussion at 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-beam-user/201603.mbox/browser
 and 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-beam-dev/201603.mbox/browser 
. Exact name still being bikeshedded.

Design document: http://s.apache.org/beam-metrics-api


> Introduce an easy API for pipeline metrics
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-147
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-147
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: beam-model, sdk-java-core, sdk-py
>            Reporter: Robert Bradshaw
>            Assignee: Ben Chambers
>
> The existing Aggregators are confusing both because of their name and because 
> they serve multiple purposes.
> Previous discussions around Aggregators/metrics/etc:
> [Discussion on user 
> list|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-beam-user/201603.mbox/browser]
>  
> [Discussion on dev 
> list|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-beam-dev/201603.mbox/browser]
>  
> Exact name still being bikeshedded.
> [Design document|http://s.apache.org/beam-metrics-api]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to