[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15977817#comment-15977817
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on BEAM-1428:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user jkff opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2620

    [BEAM-1428] KinesisIO should comply with PTransform style guide

    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1428
    
    There's lots of other issues in KinesisIO, but this at least brings its API 
surface to a level where making it more style-compliant will not require 
backward-incompatible changes.
    
    R: @jbonofre 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/jkff/incubator-beam kinesis-style

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2620.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2620
    
----
commit 65b5b0f09dd9a89871a2793e1d8da59f6f45d5a4
Author: Eugene Kirpichov <kirpic...@google.com>
Date:   2017-04-20T23:48:23Z

    [BEAM-1428] KinesisIO should comply with PTransform style guide

----


> KinesisIO should comply with PTransform style guide
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-1428
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1428
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: sdk-java-extensions
>            Reporter: Eugene Kirpichov
>              Labels: backward-incompatible, starter
>
> Suggested changes:
> - KinesisIO.Read should be a PTransform itself
> - It should have builder methods .withBlah() for setting the parameters, 
> instead of the current somewhat strange combination of the from() factory 
> methods and the using() methods



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to