[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16165347#comment-16165347
]
Chamikara Jayalath commented on BEAM-2955:
------------------------------------------
I like approach (1) as well since seems like it'll minimize code duplication.
Are there any drawbacks (features, performance) of approach (1) compared to
approach (2) ?
Assigning this JIRA to you.
Also ccing some folks interested in I/O.
[~reuvenlax] [~jkff] [~jbonofre]
> Create a Cloud Bigtable HBase connector
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-2955
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2955
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: sdk-java-gcp
> Reporter: Solomon Duskis
> Assignee: Chamikara Jayalath
>
> The Cloud Bigtable (CBT) team has had a Dataflow connector maintained in a
> different repo for awhile. Recently, we did some reworking of the Cloud
> Bigtable client that would allow it to better coexist in the Beam ecosystem,
> and we also released a Beam connector in our repository that exposes HBase
> idioms rather than the Protobuf idioms of BigtableIO. More information about
> the customer experience of the HBase connector can be found here:
> [https://cloud.google.com/bigtable/docs/dataflow-hbase].
> The Beam repo is a much better place to house a Cloud Bigtable HBase
> connector. There are a couple of ways we can implement this new connector:
> # The CBT connector depends on artifacts in the io/hbase maven project. We
> can create a new extend HBaseIO for the purposes of CBT. We would have to
> add some features to HBaseIO to make that work (dynamic rebalancing, and a
> way for HBase and CBT's size estimation models to coexist)
> # The BigtableIO connector works well, and we can add an adapter layer on top
> of it. I have a proof of concept of it here:
> [https://github.com/sduskis/cloud-bigtable-client/tree/add_beam/bigtable-dataflow-parent/bigtable-hbase-beam].
> # We can build a separate CBT HBase connector.
> I'm happy to do the work. I would appreciate some guidance and discussion
> about the right approach.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
