[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16247756#comment-16247756
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on BEAM-2899:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user tgroh opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4111

    [BEAM-2899] Migrate Stream Control to the fn-execution module

    Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and 
easily:
    
     - [ ] Make sure there is a [JIRA 
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BEAM/issues/) filed for the 
change (usually before you start working on it).  Trivial changes like typos do 
not require a JIRA issue.  Your pull request should address just this issue, 
without pulling in other changes.
     - [ ] Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject 
line and body.
     - [ ] Format the pull request title like `[BEAM-XXX] Fixes bug in 
ApproximateQuantiles`, where you replace `BEAM-XXX` with the appropriate JIRA 
issue.
     - [ ] Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to 
understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
     - [ ] Run `mvn clean verify` to make sure basic checks pass. A more 
thorough check will be performed on your pull request automatically.
     - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache [Individual 
Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf).
    
    ---


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/tgroh/beam stream_observer_wrappers

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4111.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #4111
    
----
commit cbdb16ad9c9b65351cc5c9e50d369369718db039
Author: Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com>
Date:   2017-11-10T01:06:23Z

    Move fn-execution org.apache.beam.harness.channel
    
    'harness' suggests the SDK harness package, which is not correct, as
    this is used by both runners and the SDK harness.

commit 55afa0b5e9d3b111ad92aec30c4512f061a7ac28
Author: Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com>
Date:   2017-11-10T02:31:26Z

    Move Common Fn Execution Concepts to fn-execution
    
    Move Stream control packages to fn-execution. Update java package names.

----


> Universal Local Runner
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-2899
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2899
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: runner-core
>            Reporter: Henning Rohde
>            Assignee: Thomas Groh
>              Labels: portability
>
> To make the portability effort tractable, we should implement a Universal 
> Local Runner (ULR) in Java that runs in a single server process plus docker 
> containers for the SDK harness containers. It would serve multiple purposes:
>   (1) A reference implementation for other runners. Ideally, any new feature 
> should be implemented in the ULR first.
>   (2) A fully-featured test runner for SDKs who participate in the 
> portability framework. It thus complements the direct runners.
>   (3) A test runner for user code that depends on or customizes the runtime 
> environment. For example, a DoFn that shells out has a dependency that may be 
> satisfied on the user's desktop (and thus works fine on the direct runner), 
> but perhaps not by the container harness image. The ULR allows for an easy 
> way to find out.
> The Java direct runner presumably has lots of pieces that can be reused.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to