[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218445#comment-15218445
]
Davor Bonaci commented on BEAM-134:
-----------------------------------
A quick doc showing how the code changes for one of the high-value cases?
> Investigate use of AutoValue
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-134
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-134
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: sdk-java-core
> Reporter: Scott Wegner
> Assignee: Scott Wegner
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments:
> 0001-Mark-classes-which-might-benefit-from-AutoValue.patch
>
>
> The initial PR for [BEAM-118] added a dependency on AutoValue to
> auto-implement equality semantics for a new POJO. We decided to remove the
> dependency because the cost of adding the dependency for this feature may not
> be worth it for the value.
> However, we could use AutoValue for all of our POJO's, it might be worth it.
> The proposal here is to follow-up with an investigation on whether we would
> gain significant value to porting our code to use AutoValue instead of
> hand-written POJO's.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
