[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15553367#comment-15553367
]
Ben Chambers commented on BEAM-726:
-----------------------------------
Great point. We could consider also choosing a different suffix. Perhaps
"PipelineExecution" or "PipelineHandle" or something like that. That would need
a little more discussion since any user-code mentioning PipelineResult would
then break. If we decide to rename it, it seems like it would be good to do
these together.
> Standardize naming of PipelineResult objects
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-726
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-726
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: beam-model
> Reporter: Ben Chambers
> Assignee: Frances Perry
> Priority: Minor
>
> Today:
> PipelineResult is an interface returned by running a pipeline.
> DataflowPipelineJob is the Dataflow implementation of that interface
> FlinkRunnerResult is the Flink implementation
> EvaluationContext is the Spark implementation
> DirectPipelineResult is the DirectRunner implementation
> Ideally, all the names would indicate that they are a PipelineResult, like
> the DirectRunner does.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
