[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aljoscha Krettek updated BEAM-1092:
-----------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: Is 1) necessary if we do 2).

I think shading is very necessary (unfortunately) so I like this issue but I 
would also like to keep the example/archetype POMs as simple as possible.)

> Shade commonly used libraries (e.g. Guava) to avoid class conflicts
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-1092
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1092
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: examples-java, sdk-java-extensions
>    Affects Versions: 0.3.0-incubating
>            Reporter: Maximilian Michels
>            Assignee: Frances Perry
>             Fix For: 0.4.0-incubating
>
>
> Beam shades away some of its dependencies like Guava to avoid user classes 
> from clashing with these dependencies. Some of the artifacts, e.g. KafkaIO, 
> do not shade any classes and directly depend on potentially conflicting 
> libraries (e.g. Guava). Also, users might manually add such libraries as 
> dependencies.
> Runners who add classes to the classpath (e.g. Hadoop) can run into conflict 
> with multiple versions of the same class. To prevent that, we should adjust 
> the Maven archetypes pom files used for the Quickstart to perform shading of 
> commonly used libraries (again, Guava is often the culprit).
> To prevent the problem in the first place, we should expand the shading of 
> Guava and other libraries to all modules which make use of these. 
> To solve both dimensions of the issue, we need to address:
> 1. Adding shading of commonly used libraries to the archetypes poms
> 2. Properly shade all commonly used libraries in the SDK modules
> 2) seems to be of highest priority since it affects users who simply use the 
> provided IO modules.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to