wenbingshen commented on PR #4179: URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4179#issuecomment-1905221708
> Refer to the release note: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/release-4.16.0 Can we use `bookkeeper_server_ADD_ENTRY` and `bookkeeper_server_READ_ENTRY` instead? @hangc0276 These metrics have different meanings. When we use the V2 protocol, `ADD_ENTRY_REQUEST` : Indicates the execution time from when the request enters the write queue to when the response to the production request is sent. `ADD_ENTRY` : Indicates the execution time from the beginning of request processing to the completion of writing to the journal `WRITE_THREAD_QUEUED_LATENCY` : Indicates the waiting time between the production request entering the queue and starting to be processed. Based on the above indicators, we use: The time it takes to send a production response to the client on network IO: `ADD_ENTRY_REQUEST - ADD_ENTRY - WRITE_THREAD_QUEUED_LATENCY` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
