mihaibudiu commented on code in PR #4147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4147#discussion_r1917212104
##########
core/src/test/resources/sql/sub-query.iq:
##########
@@ -1871,13 +1871,15 @@ select sal from "scott".emp e
(0 rows)
!ok
-EnumerableCalc(expr#0..4=[{inputs}], expr#5=[RAND()],
expr#6=[CAST($t5):INTEGER NOT NULL], expr#7=[2], expr#8=[MOD($t6, $t7)],
expr#9=[3], expr#10=[=($t8, $t9)], expr#11=[OR($t10, $t4)], SAL=[$t1],
$condition=[$t11])
- EnumerableMergeJoin(condition=[=($2, $3)], joinType=[left])
- EnumerableSort(sort0=[$2], dir0=[ASC])
- EnumerableCalc(expr#0..7=[{inputs}], EMPNO=[$t0], SAL=[$t5],
DEPTNO=[$t7])
- EnumerableTableScan(table=[[scott, EMP]])
- EnumerableCalc(expr#0..2=[{inputs}], expr#3=[false], DEPTNO=[$t0],
$f1=[$t3])
- EnumerableTableScan(table=[[scott, DEPT]])
+EnumerableCalc(expr#0..2=[{inputs}], expr#3=[RAND()],
expr#4=[CAST($t3):INTEGER NOT NULL], expr#5=[2], expr#6=[MOD($t4, $t5)],
expr#7=[3], expr#8=[=($t6, $t7)], expr#9=[OR($t8, $t2)], SAL=[$t0],
$condition=[$t9])
Review Comment:
all these now contain correlated subqueries.
I wonder whether these tests expect uncorrelated results. This would
indicate that either the decorrelator fails on the new plans, or perhaps it's
run too early.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
