commits  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Escape single quotes in string literals pushed to Cassandra and Geode [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Escape single quotes in string literals pushed to Cassandra and Geode [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated (2bdc6af448 -> d0127bbfbc) zhenchen
• Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7634] JoinExpandOrToUnionRule incorrectly expands OR branches with non-equi predicates referencing both join inputs [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7640] Enumerable engine should execute aggregates whose implementor comes from a custom RexImplementorTable [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7639] support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7639] Support bitwise right shift (>>) operator and RIGHTSHIFT function [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7638] SetOpToFilterRule MINUS drops rows when right-side filters evaluate to UNKNOWN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7638] SetOpToFilterRule MINUS drops rows when right-side filters evaluate to UNKNOWN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7638] SetOpToFilterRule MINUS drops rows when right-side filters evaluate to UNKNOWN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7638] SetOpToFilterRule MINUS drops rows when right-side filters evaluate to UNKNOWN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7638] SetOpToFilterRule MINUS drops rows when right-side filters evaluate to UNKNOWN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7638] SetOpToFilterRule MINUS drops rows when right-side filters evaluate to UNKNOWN [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7636] Materialized view union rewriting drops rows when the … [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7636] Materialized view union rewriting drops rows when the … [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7636] Materialized view union rewriting drops rows when the … [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7242] Implement a rule to eliminate LITERAL_AGG so that other databases can handle it zhenchen
• Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7635] Simplification result of conjunction of comparisons depends on terms order [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7635] Simplification result of conjunction of comparisons depends on terms order [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7635] Simplification result of conjunction of comparisons depends on terms order [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7635] Simplification result of conjunction of comparisons depends on terms order [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7635] Simplification result of conjunction of comparisons depends on terms order [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7635] Simplification result of conjunction of comparisons depends on terms order [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7635] Simplification result of conjunction of comparisons depends on terms order [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7635] Simplification result of conjunction of comparisons depends on terms order [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7635] Simplification result of conjunction of comparisons depends on terms order [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite-site) branch main updated: Website deployed from calcite@46228a3a6fcf5b0b4119a8f2a0a2c71a5e0d590a asf-ci-deploy
• (calcite) branch main updated: Site: Update Ran Tao githubId zhenchen
• (calcite) branch site updated: Site: Update Ran Tao githubId github-bot
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-6344] RelToSqlConverter invalid quotation for arrays and item operator(ansi dialect) xuzifu666
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7631] Introduce a composable RexImplementorTable SPI for operator code generation mbudiu
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSOR throws an exception while validating the query xuzifu666
• (calcite) branch main updated: Re-enable [CALCITE-685] Correlated scalar sub-query in SELECT clause throws zhenchen
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver mbudiu
• [PR] [CALCITE-7282] Could a bot be used to resolve JIRA issues [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7282] Could a bot be used to resolve JIRA issues [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7282] Could a bot be used to resolve JIRA issues [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7282] Could a bot be used to resolve JIRA issues [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] Re-enable [CALCITE-685] Correlated scalar sub-query in SELECT clause throws [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Re-enable [CALCITE-685] Correlated scalar sub-query in SELECT clause throws [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Re-enable [CALCITE-685] Correlated scalar sub-query in SELECT clause throws [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Re-enable [CALCITE-685] Correlated scalar sub-query in SELECT clause throws [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] Site: Update Ran Tao githubId [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Ran Tao githubId [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Ran Tao githubId [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Ran Tao githubId [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite-site) branch main updated: Website deployed from calcite@84273aa533e029327446961231a9d304b070f58c asf-ci-deploy
• (calcite) branch main updated: Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC snuyanzin
• (calcite) branch site updated: Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC github-bot
• [PR] [CALCITE-6344] RelToSqlConverter invalid quotation for arrays and item operator(ansi dialect) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6344] RelToSqlConverter invalid quotation for arrays and item operator(ansi dialect) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6344] RelToSqlConverter invalid quotation for arrays and item operator(ansi dialect) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6344] RelToSqlConverter invalid quotation for arrays and item operator(ansi dialect) [calcite] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7440] Preserve correlated scope mapping in RelToSqlConverter [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7440] Preserve correlated scope mapping in RelToSqlConverter [calcite] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7439] Qualify GROUP BY keys for DISTINCT over joins [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7439] Qualify GROUP BY keys for DISTINCT over joins [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-5525] Rewrite GROUPING_ID to GROUPING for PostgreSQL and Presto dialects [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5525] Rewrite GROUPING_ID to GROUPING for PostgreSQL and Presto dialects [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5525] Rewrite GROUPING_ID to GROUPING for PostgreSQL and Presto dialects [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5525] Rewrite GROUPING_ID to GROUPING for PostgreSQL and Presto dialects [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7631] Introduce a composable RexImplementorTable SPI for operator code generation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7631] Introduce a composable RexImplementorTable SPI for operator code generation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7631] Introduce a composable RexImplementorTable SPI for operator code generation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7631] Introduce a composable RexImplementorTable SPI for operator code generation [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7626] Pass user-specified JAVA_OPTS to sqlline/sqlsh zabetak
• [PR] Replace deprecated Stack with ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace deprecated Stack with ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace deprecated Stack with ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7508] RelToSqlConverter registers wrong alias for correlation variable in visit(Project) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7508] RelToSqlConverter registers wrong alias for correlation variable in visit(Project) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7508] RelToSqlConverter registers wrong alias for correlation variable in visit(Project) [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7546] NullPointerException in SqlToRelConverter for UNNEST(array) AS alias under conformance with allowAliasUnnestItems=true mbudiu
• [PR] [CALCITE-7630] BETWEEN unparses incorrectly when left side contains a BETWEEN expression [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7630] BETWEEN unparses incorrectly when left side contains a BETWEEN expression [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated (9089f40a0a -> 7311760481) mbudiu
  • (calcite) 01/02: [CALCITE-7630] BETWEEN unparses incorrectly when left side contains a BETWEEN expression mbudiu
  • (calcite) 02/02: Unparse should not use sep unless inside a list mbudiu
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7628] In the interpreter, MINUS and INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs return wrong result jhyde
• [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSUR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSUR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSUR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSOR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSOR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSOR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSOR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7626] Pass user-specified JAVA_OPTS to sqlline/sqlsh [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7626] Pass user-specified JAVA_OPTS to sqlline/sqlsh [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7626] Pass user-specified JAVA_OPTS to sqlline/sqlsh [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7626] Pass user-specified JAVA_OPTS to sqlline/sqlsh [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated (8c1ac3640e -> beee52abac) zhenchen
• [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages