janwesterkamp commented on issue #7085: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/issues/7085#issuecomment-2697507341
Why not? Do I have to add senseless statements only to fulfil your requirement, @davsclaus ? It was possible to do in 3.18.4, so 3.19.1 is introducing a breaking change here. Here my use case: I am checking a positive list of values with these statements and the .otherwhise() statement will catch all other values and breaks further processing (failing fast). I started this originally because the REST DSL had some limitations in input validation (might become better now), but now it's used for more complex checks too.. The validated values are further processed later in other routes (where the .when() statements contain actions). In my eyes, this is an valid use case and empty when() should be allowed in newer versions. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
