apupier opened a new pull request, #23904:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/23904

   Root cause: deadlock between BaseService.lock and Spring's lifecycleMonitor 
during CamelContext shutdown in afterAll.
   
   Thread 1 (afterAll -> context.stop()):
     AbstractCamelContext.doStop()
       -> JmsProducer.doStop()
         -> ReplyManagerSupport.doStop()
           -> DefaultMessageListenerContainer.doShutdown()
             -> Object.wait() <- blocked, waiting for listener thread
   
   Thread 2 (QueueReplyManager listener):
     DestinationResolverDelegate.resolveDestinationName()
       -> BaseService.lock <- blocked, held by Thread 1
   
   Introduced by CAMEL-20199 (Oct 2024) which migrated synchronized blocks to 
ReentrantLock. Before: BaseService.stop() used synchronized(lock) on a private 
Object, while the inner class used synchronized(QueueReplyManager.this) on the 
instance monitor — two independent locks. After: both became 
QueueReplyManager.this.lock (the same inherited ReentrantLock), creating the 
circular wait.
   
   Fix: DestinationResolverDelegate now uses a dedicated ReentrantLock instead 
of BaseService.lock, restoring the original two-lock design. Added volatile + 
fast-path for the destination field.
   
   Applied to both camel-jms and camel-sjms which share the same pattern via 
their respective QueueReplyManager classes.
   
   # Description
   
   currently most if the 4.18.x builds ends up stucked until timeout, see 
[CAMEL-23710](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-23710)
   
   # Target
   
   - [ ] I checked that the commit is targeting the correct branch (Camel 4 
uses the `main` branch)
   
   # Tracking
   - [ ] If this is a large change, bug fix, or code improvement, I checked 
there is a [JIRA issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL) filed for 
the change (usually before you start working on it).
   
   <!--
   # *Note*: trivial changes like, typos, minor documentation fixes and other 
small items do not require a JIRA issue. In this case your pull request should 
address just this issue, without pulling in other changes.
   -->
   
   # Apache Camel coding standards and style
   
   - [ ] I checked that each commit in the pull request has a meaningful 
subject line and body.
   
   <!--
   If you're unsure, you can format the pull request title like `[CAMEL-XXX] 
Fixes bug in camel-file component`, where you replace `CAMEL-XXX` with the 
appropriate JIRA issue.
   -->
   
   - [ ] I have run `mvn clean install -DskipTests` locally from root folder 
and I have committed all auto-generated changes.
   
   <!--
   You can run the aforementioned command in your module so that the build 
auto-formats your code. This will also be verified as part of the checks and 
your PR may be rejected if if there are uncommited changes after running `mvn 
clean install -DskipTests`.
   
   You can learn more about the contribution guidelines at 
https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
   -->
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to