This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

oscerd pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/camel-website.git

commit 6a8ebdaf59b72e9cc24f54a0cd2c18e902a8364f
Author: Andrea Cosentino <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri Sep 4 09:09:41 2026 +0200

    Added CVE-2026-84180
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
    Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013qz9ir11vuQYfQApzwHAHD
    Signed-off-by: Andrea Cosentino <[email protected]>
---
 content/security/CVE-2026-84180.md      | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
 content/security/CVE-2026-84180.txt.asc | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)

diff --git a/content/security/CVE-2026-84180.md 
b/content/security/CVE-2026-84180.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e82f4264
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/security/CVE-2026-84180.md
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+---
+title: "Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-84180"
+date: 2026-08-31T10:00:00+02:00
+url: /security/CVE-2026-84180.html
+draft: false
+type: security-advisory
+cve: CVE-2026-84180
+severity: MEDIUM
+summary: "Camel-Knative: information disclosure - a route failure was written 
back to the remote caller as the response body, so the exception class, message 
and stack trace of an internal error reached an external sender"
+description: "When processing of an exchange failed on the consumer side, the 
Knative HTTP consumer wrote the resulting exception back to the remote caller 
as the response body, including its class name, message and stack trace. An 
external sender could therefore provoke a failure and read internal detail 
about the deployment: class and package names, file system or host names 
carried in exception messages, and the shape of the route. That detail is 
useful for building a more targeted at [...]
+mitigation: "Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on 
the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x 
LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. The consumer now honours a 
muteException option that defaults to true, so a route failure returns an empty 
body with the error status rather than the exception. Set muteException=false 
to restore the previous output. For deployments that cannot upgrade 
immediately, add an onException handler [...]
+credit: "This issue was discovered by Claude Security Scan Tool"
+affected: "From 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1."
+fixed: 4.18.5, 4.22.1 and 4.23.0
+---
+
+The JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24428 refers to 
the various commits that resolved the issue, and has more details.
+
+The fix was merged on main in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25685 
(commit 22cccdecdebd948bea1bcdd6a184345d013a3b1a), backported to camel-4.22.x 
in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25835 (commit 
ca9f326ada9703d32badabad2f32c66886ffa470) and to camel-4.18.x in 
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25836 (commit 
51e3f9047693120b4dd086dcceba16356f92e0aa).
+
+The issue is classified as CWE-209 Generation of Error Message Containing 
Sensitive Information. The camel-4.14.x line reached end of life before this 
fix and does not receive it; deployments on 4.14.x should move to 4.18.5 or 
later.
diff --git a/content/security/CVE-2026-84180.txt.asc 
b/content/security/CVE-2026-84180.txt.asc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..183e38e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/security/CVE-2026-84180.txt.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
+Hash: SHA512
+
+- ---
+title: "Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-84180"
+date: 2026-08-31T10:00:00+02:00
+url: /security/CVE-2026-84180.html
+draft: false
+type: security-advisory
+cve: CVE-2026-84180
+severity: MEDIUM
+summary: "Camel-Knative: information disclosure - a route failure was written 
back to the remote caller as the response body, so the exception class, message 
and stack trace of an internal error reached an external sender"
+description: "When processing of an exchange failed on the consumer side, the 
Knative HTTP consumer wrote the resulting exception back to the remote caller 
as the response body, including its class name, message and stack trace. An 
external sender could therefore provoke a failure and read internal detail 
about the deployment: class and package names, file system or host names 
carried in exception messages, and the shape of the route. That detail is 
useful for building a more targeted at [...]
+mitigation: "Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on 
the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x 
LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. The consumer now honours a 
muteException option that defaults to true, so a route failure returns an empty 
body with the error status rather than the exception. Set muteException=false 
to restore the previous output. For deployments that cannot upgrade 
immediately, add an onException handler [...]
+credit: "This issue was discovered by Claude Security Scan Tool"
+affected: "From 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1."
+fixed: 4.18.5, 4.22.1 and 4.23.0
+- ---
+
+The JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24428 refers to 
the various commits that resolved the issue, and has more details.
+
+The fix was merged on main in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25685 
(commit 22cccdecdebd948bea1bcdd6a184345d013a3b1a), backported to camel-4.22.x 
in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25835 (commit 
ca9f326ada9703d32badabad2f32c66886ffa470) and to camel-4.18.x in 
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25836 (commit 
51e3f9047693120b4dd086dcceba16356f92e0aa).
+
+The issue is classified as CWE-209 Generation of Error Message Containing 
Sensitive Information. The camel-4.14.x line reached end of life before this 
fix and does not receive it; deployments on 4.14.x should move to 4.18.5 or 
later.
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEJ2Y0ButtuvUpHyYV406fOAL/QQAFAmqabrUACgkQ406fOAL/
+QQArfggAruQhAary7elqu01648s4ZNfyp+84N4qJ/MM1wkdWKX21oBeVerU0u0iV
+tEaJ7Cq11gO4vc0v5U9bnx+L67t1d6FtOwzlAnQWdyPQKYCPMOLjXcahPJHpfbH4
+KKfnlnGORlF6psRFAuUuFBqDPLm8LK/T6fRJTriVqUfCiqrgpMpXGOaRYftkY8KJ
+C9mu4dgfGSycB64yQq0MBg5xABEoFIfeYaIDg2X07X3Hp5UVB1n2tqcgE0ilVDNl
+tfacjghnWBO4cI9qNecqWgNjijXO2BH0ZMcpCXxbvHSPYJU8hOnxAwST9A9gGnvJ
+s1Xh/Wn8suX1C6+iZa1JEHMyQdwGow==
+=vCIm
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to