[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12872847#action_12872847
 ] 

Jonathan Ellis edited comment on CASSANDRA-16 at 6/15/10 9:31 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

06
    make row size at which to drop to incremental compaction configurable

05
    make row size 64 bits

04
    add LazilyCompactedRow

03
    r/m 'object count' abomination.  fix BF serialization to only use top-level 
columns (since those are the only ones it's ever checked for)

02
    make single pass over columns for indexing

01
    introduce AbstractCompactedRow, PrecompactedRow


      was (Author: jbellis):
    06
    make row size at which to drop to incremental compaction configurable

05
    make row size 64 bits

04
    add LazilyCompactedRow

03
    r/m 'object count' abomination.  fix BF serialization to only use top-level 
columns (since those

02
    make single pass over columns for indexing

01
    introduce AbstractCompactedRow, PrecompactedRow

  
> Memory efficient compactions 
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-16
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Sandeep Tata
>            Assignee: Jonathan Ellis
>             Fix For: 0.7
>
>         Attachments: 0001-introduce-AbstractCompactedRow-PrecompactedRow.txt, 
> 0002-make-single-pass-over-columns-for-indexing.txt, 
> 0003-r-m-object-count-abomination.-fix-BF-serialization-to-.txt, 
> 0004-add-LazilyCompactedRow.txt, 0005-make-row-size-64-bits.txt, 
> 0006-make-row-size-at-which-to-drop-to-incremental-compacti.txt
>
>
> The basic idea is to allow rows to get large enough that they don't have to 
> fit in memory entirely, but can easily fit on a disk. The compaction 
> algorithm today de-serializes the entire row in memory before writing out the 
> compacted SSTable (see ColumnFamilyStore.doCompaction() and associated 
> methods).
> The requirement is to have a compaction method with a lower memory 
> requirement so we can support rows larger than available main memory. To 
> re-use the old FB example, if we stored a user's inbox in a row, we'd want 
> the inbox to grow bigger than memory so long as it fit on disk.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to