[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jonathan Ellis updated CASSANDRA-1358:
--------------------------------------

     Summary: Clogged RRS/RMS stages can hold up processing of gossip messages 
and request acks  (was: Message deserializer pool will never grow beyond a 
single thread.)
    Priority: Major  (was: Minor)

> Clogged RRS/RMS stages can hold up processing of gossip messages and request 
> acks
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-1358
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1358
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 0.5
>         Environment: All.
>            Reporter: Mike Malone
>             Fix For: 0.6.5
>
>
> The message deserialization process can become a bottleneck that prevents 
> efficient resource utilization because the executor that manages the 
> deserialization process will never grow beyond a single thread. The message 
> deserializer executor is instantiated in the MessagingService constructor as 
> a JMXEnableThreadPoolExecutor, which extends 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor. The thread pool is instantiated with 
> a corePoolSize of 1 and a maximumPoolSize of 
> Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors(). But, according to the 
> ThreadPoolExecutor documentation "using an unbounded queue (for example a 
> LinkedBlockingQueue without a predefined capacity) will cause new tasks to be 
> queued in cases where all corePoolSize threads are busy. Thus, no more than 
> corePoolSize threads will ever be created. (And the value of the 
> maximumPoolSize therefore doesn't have any effect.)"
> The message deserializer pool uses a LinkedBlockingQueue, so there will never 
> be more than one deserialization thread. This issue became a problem in our 
> production cluster when the MESSAGE-DESERIALIZER-POOL began to back up on a 
> node that was only lightly loaded. We increased the core pool size to 4 and 
> the situation improved, but the deserializer pool was still backing up while 
> the machine was not fully utilized (less than 100% CPU utilization). This 
> leads me to think that the deserializer thread is blocking on some sort of 
> I/O, which seems like it shouldn't happen.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to