[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14153719#comment-14153719
]
Joshua McKenzie commented on CASSANDRA-8005:
--------------------------------------------
+1 for separating the implementation details of our schema tables from the
drivers' scope. I'd much rather we be able to make changes and have that not
push pressure down to drivers to make changes to stay in sync, nevermind the
efficiencies gained by implementing that logic in one place rather than forcing
re-implementation.
> Server-side DESCRIBE
> --------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-8005
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8005
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: API
> Reporter: Tyler Hobbs
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: cql3
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> The various {{DESCRIBE}} commands are currently implemented by cqlsh, and
> nearly identical implementations exist in many drivers. There are several
> motivations for making {{DESCRIBE}} part of the CQL language:
> * Eliminate the (fairly complex) duplicate implementations across drivers and
> cqlsh
> * Get closer to allowing drivers to not have to fetch the schema tables.
> (Minor changes to prepared statements are also needed.)
> * Have instantaneous support for new schema features in cqlsh. (You
> currently have to update the bundled python driver.)
> * Support writing out schemas where it makes sense. One good example of this
> is backups. You need to restore the schema before restoring data in the case
> of total loss, so it makes sense to write out the schema alongside snapshots.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
