[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14168384#comment-14168384
 ] 

mck commented on CASSANDRA-6091:
--------------------------------

[~alexliu68] Any reason we can't (at least to begin with since this is a right 
headache) join the splits after the call to describe_splits_ex, as is done in 
this [patch|https://github.com/michaelsembwever/cassandra/pull/1/files]?

Although one thing about this patch that i haven't yet understood, when i test 
against a single-node cluster i expect rejoinAdjacentSplits(..) to return a 
list of one split, token range "-8940796744825771419" to "6948181744525544", 
but instead i get that plus two more splits, in total three splits that look 
like

 1) "-8940796744825771419" to "6948181744525544"
 2) "-1" to "-8940796744825771419"
 3) "6948181744525544" to "-8940796744825771419"

This is highlighted by the assert statement commented out in ACFIF line 253 
Am i doing something wrong or is describe_local_ring?
 

> Better Vnode support in hadoop/pig
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6091
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6091
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Hadoop
>            Reporter: Alex Liu
>            Assignee: Alex Liu
>
> CASSANDRA-6084 shows there are some issues during running hadoop/pig job if 
> vnodes are enable. Also the hadoop performance of vnode enabled nodes  are 
> bad for there are so many splits.
> The idea is to combine vnode splits into a big sudo splits so it work like 
> vnode is disable for hadoop/pig job



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to