[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14183674#comment-14183674 ]
Karl Mueller commented on CASSANDRA-8177: ----------------------------------------- serial repairs are also terrible for us in 2.0.10 parallel is better > sequential repair is much more expensive than parallel repair > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-8177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8177 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sean Bridges > Assignee: Yuki Morishita > Attachments: cassc-week.png, iostats.png > > > This is with 2.0.10 > The attached graph shows io read/write throughput (as measured with iostat) > when doing repairs. > The large hump on the left is a sequential repair of one node. The two much > smaller peaks on the right are parallel repairs. > This is a 3 node cluster using vnodes (I know vnodes on small clusters isn't > recommended). Cassandra reports load of 40 gigs. > We noticed a similar problem with a larger cluster. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)