[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14253933#comment-14253933
]
Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-8520:
----------------------------------------------
bq. I mean touches sstables and not memtables, because the majority of reads
work is this way. Ideally we would do this test against a new better storage
format as well, and certainly we would optimise the read path.
Ah. This makes sense. Sorry. And yes, the issue is labeled 3.1 because it's
blocked by CASSANDRA-8099.
> Prototype thread per core
> -------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-8520
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8520
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> Let's prototype the best possible scenario for how well we can perform with a
> thread per core design by simplifying everything we can. For instance,
> - No HH, no RR, no replication at all
> - No MessagingService
> - No compaction (so test a workload w/o overwrites)
> - No repair
> - Just local writes and reads
> If we can't get a big win (say at least 2x) with these simplifications then I
> think we can say that it's not worth it.
> If we can get a big win, then we can either refine the prototype to make it
> more realistic or start working on it in earnest.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
