[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14264565#comment-14264565 ]
Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-8546: ------------------------------------- If CASSANDRA-8099 fixes it somehow, that's sufficient in my book. A BTree, for the record, can happily achieve amortized constant time insertion at the end, if so desired. So long as your depth does not exceed the fan_factor (which is pretty much impossible here). The correct data structure here is most likely a BTree, a Trie, or a hybrid such as a String B-Tree. Not specifically for optimising this case, but in general. For 3.1 or 3.2, assuming no other impediments appear, I expect this all to be replaced along with (or shortly after) the updated storage format. > RangeTombstoneList becoming bottleneck on tombstone heavy tasks > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-8546 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8546 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core > Environment: 2.0.11 / 2.1 > Reporter: Dominic Letz > Assignee: Benedict > Fix For: 2.1.3 > > Attachments: cassandra-2.0.11-8546.txt, cassandra-2.1-8546.txt, > tombstone_test.tgz > > > I would like to propose a change of the data structure used in the > RangeTombstoneList to store and insert tombstone ranges to something with at > least O(log N) insert in the middle and at near O(1) and start AND end. Here > is why: > When having tombstone heavy work-loads the current implementation of > RangeTombstoneList becomes a bottleneck with slice queries. > Scanning the number of tombstones up to the default maximum (100k) can take > up to 3 minutes of how addInternal() scales on insertion of middle and start > elements. > The attached test shows that with 50k deletes from both sides of a range. > INSERT 1...110000 > flush() > DELETE 1...50000 > DELETE 110000...60000 > While one direction performs ok (~400ms on my notebook): > {code} > SELECT * FROM timeseries WHERE name = 'a' ORDER BY timestamp DESC LIMIT 1 > {code} > The other direction underperforms (~7seconds on my notebook) > {code} > SELECT * FROM timeseries WHERE name = 'a' ORDER BY timestamp ASC LIMIT 1 > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)