[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14351543#comment-14351543
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-8413:
-------------------------------------

It occurs to me that this may be more significant still for LCS, since we 
explicitly narrow the space over which we operate. Obviously it's a bounded 
problem for LCS, but still.... I think we should simply regularize the bits 
over the known min/max of the sstable we're writing.

> Bloom filter false positive ratio is not honoured
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8413
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8413
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
>             Fix For: 2.1.4
>
>         Attachments: 8413.hack.txt
>
>
> Whilst thinking about CASSANDRA-7438 and hash bits, I realised we have a 
> problem with sabotaging our bloom filters when using the murmur3 partitioner. 
> I have performed a very quick test to confirm this risk is real.
> Since a typical cluster uses the same murmur3 hash for partitioning as we do 
> for bloom filter lookups, and we own a contiguous range, we can guarantee 
> that the top X bits collide for all keys on the node. This translates into 
> poor bloom filter distribution. I quickly hacked LongBloomFilterTest to 
> simulate the problem, and the result in these tests is _up to_ a doubling of 
> the actual false positive ratio. The actual change will depend on the key 
> distribution, the number of keys, the false positive ratio, the number of 
> nodes, the token distribution, etc. But seems to be a real problem for 
> non-vnode clusters of at least ~128 nodes in size.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to