[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14517305#comment-14517305
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-8568:
-------------------------------------

[~krummas]: I've rebased against 8984-alt and force pushed. There are some 
failing unit tests but these are all broken against trunk, and appear to be due 
to embedded Cassandra and singletons. I'll rebase again once they're fixed, but 
since 8984-alt is agreed except for testing you should be good to begin review 
at your leisure.

> Impose new API on data tracker modifications that makes correct usage obvious 
> and imposes safety
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8568
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8568
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Benedict
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> DataTracker has become a bit of a quagmire, and not at all obvious to 
> interface with, with many subtly different modifiers. I suspect it is still 
> subtly broken, especially around error recovery.
> I propose piggy-backing on CASSANDRA-7705 to offer RAII (and GC-enforced, for 
> those situations where a try/finally block isn't possible) objects that have 
> transactional behaviour, and with few simple declarative methods that can be 
> composed simply to provide all of the functionality we currently need.
> See CASSANDRA-8399 for context



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to