[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14543376#comment-14543376
]
Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-8897:
-------------------------------------
[~stef1927]: It looks to me like we can simply stop calling
channel.sharedCopy() in the constructor: since these objects aren't pooled
anymore, their lifetimes should be not a problem, and should be guarded by the
normal OpOrder or SSTableReader ref counting pathways. Taking a reference to
each reader is something we explicitly wanted to avoid by the introduction of
the OpOrder, so we should avoid it here as well.
However, it is something that's bugged me that we use a CLQ in Ref, and I've
filed CASSANDRA-9379 to discuss updating this. As mentioned there, I prefer to
avoid CHM or NBHM.
> Remove FileCacheService, instead pooling the buffers
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-8897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8897
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Benedict
> Assignee: Stefania
> Fix For: 3.x
>
> Attachments: 9240_test_results.txt,
> snapshot-1431582436640-cpu-backtraces.png,
> snapshot-1431582436640-cpu-calltree-compression-8897.nps,
> snapshot-1431582436640-cpu-calltree-compression-trunk.nps
>
>
> After CASSANDRA-8893, a RAR will be a very lightweight object and will not
> need caching, so we can eliminate this cache entirely. Instead we should have
> a pool of buffers that are page-aligned.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
