[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14614284#comment-14614284
 ] 

Robert Stupp commented on CASSANDRA-8413:
-----------------------------------------

Thanks.
Committed as 23fd75f27c40462636f09920719b5dcbef5b8f36 with a few sentences in 
NEWS.txt regarding the new SSTable file version.

> Bloom filter false positive ratio is not honoured
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8413
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8413
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Robert Stupp
>             Fix For: 3.0 beta 1
>
>         Attachments: 8413-patch.txt, 8413.hack-3.0.txt, 8413.hack.txt
>
>
> Whilst thinking about CASSANDRA-7438 and hash bits, I realised we have a 
> problem with sabotaging our bloom filters when using the murmur3 partitioner. 
> I have performed a very quick test to confirm this risk is real.
> Since a typical cluster uses the same murmur3 hash for partitioning as we do 
> for bloom filter lookups, and we own a contiguous range, we can guarantee 
> that the top X bits collide for all keys on the node. This translates into 
> poor bloom filter distribution. I quickly hacked LongBloomFilterTest to 
> simulate the problem, and the result in these tests is _up to_ a doubling of 
> the actual false positive ratio. The actual change will depend on the key 
> distribution, the number of keys, the false positive ratio, the number of 
> nodes, the token distribution, etc. But seems to be a real problem for 
> non-vnode clusters of at least ~128 nodes in size.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to