[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14627789#comment-14627789 ]
Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-7066: ------------------------------------- Sorry for the slow response on this, but since it is quite critical to our correctness I wanted to take some time over it. Before we finally commit I will likely take another overall run through it all yet. I've pushed some suggestions [here|https://github.com/belliottsmith/cassandra/tree/7066-suggestions]. Some minor stylistic suggestions, but there are a couple of core modifications: * I've modified the {{TransactionLogs}} / {{LifecycleTransaction}} integration to match the definition of {{Transactional}} (although I have just noticed the {{Transactional}} class comments mismatch the {{commit}} method comments, which do cause lack of clarity - we should fix that before commit): ** {{prepareToCommit}} should never make changes that are not able to be rolled-back during {{abort}}, and under the prior design AFAICT the log files on disk could be left representing a different state to the one in memory in the event of a failure after {{LifecycleTransaction.prepareToCommit}} completes successfully. The intention of {{Transactional}} was that in this situation, where error inducing behaviour can occur during the logical commit phase, these actions all be taken at-once, at the start of the {{commit}} method, and are used to determine success/failure - actually throwing the exception. ** Just as importantly, we now stick to one the main goals of {{Transactional}}, that each {{Transactional}} object in a graph should forward the calls on to the same methods in its child {{Transactional}} objects (the idea being it's easier to reason about) * I've moved the parent directory descriptor sync to ensure it creates a happens-before edge between the file deletions and the log deletions * I've commented that we need to introduce this also between the deletion of the *opposing* log file before we continue with any of the contents deletion. Also, I'd like to propose we hide {{TransactionLogs}} a little, by making its class constructor package-private, and ensuring it only ever exists as part of a {{LifecycleTransaction}}. I think this would make it much easier for _users_ of these classes to reason about things, since there's only one mechanism. {{Streaming}} and {{SSTableSimpleWriter}} can both safely use this AFAICT, and {{TransactionLogs}} can just expose a {{removeUnfinishedLeftovers}} (or we can do so in {{LifecycleTransaction}}) This also needs to be rebased, since dtests are now completely untestable (unfortunately cost a non-trivial amount of time to figure out this was because of schema changes that have been committed, and the drivers expecting them to be present in 3.0) > Simplify (and unify) cleanup of compaction leftovers > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7066 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7066 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core > Reporter: Benedict > Assignee: Stefania > Priority: Minor > Labels: benedict-to-commit, compaction > Fix For: 3.x > > Attachments: 7066.txt > > > Currently we manage a list of in-progress compactions in a system table, > which we use to cleanup incomplete compactions when we're done. The problem > with this is that 1) it's a bit clunky (and leaves us in positions where we > can unnecessarily cleanup completed files, or conversely not cleanup files > that have been superceded); and 2) it's only used for a regular compaction - > no other compaction types are guarded in the same way, so can result in > duplication if we fail before deleting the replacements. > I'd like to see each sstable store in its metadata its direct ancestors, and > on startup we simply delete any sstables that occur in the union of all > ancestor sets. This way as soon as we finish writing we're capable of > cleaning up any leftovers, so we never get duplication. It's also much easier > to reason about. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)