[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14700138#comment-14700138
 ] 

Paulo Motta commented on CASSANDRA-10094:
-----------------------------------------

[~JoshuaMcKenzie] I originally created that patch for 2.2+ in the context of 
[CASSANDRA-8515|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8515].  However 
there was a problem with the tests not executing correctly on cassci due to 
other problems. In the mean time, I noticed one of the tests was still not 
working on Windows and updated the original patch, but forgot to mention it on 
the JIRA ticket (sorry for that). After tests were passing on cassci, 
[~benedict] probably commited an older version of the patch. I suppose 
d2da7606abebd98b11f8b7ec692aa7dcf5388151 was basically to update the original 
commit to the updated patch, but it was only applied to 3.0+, it needs to be 
backported to 2.2.

> Windows utest 2.2: testCommitLogFailureBeforeInitialization_mustKillJVM 
> failure
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10094
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10094
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Joshua McKenzie
>            Assignee: Paulo Motta
>              Labels: Windows
>             Fix For: 2.2.x
>
>
> Error:
> {noformat}
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: 
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.CommitLogFailurePolicyTest.testCommitLogFailureBeforeInitialization_mustKillJVM(CommitLogFailurePolicyTest.java:149)
> {noformat}
> [Failure 
> History|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/cassandra-2.2/job/cassandra-2.2_utest_win32/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/org.apache.cassandra.db/CommitLogFailurePolicyTest/testCommitLogFailureBeforeInitialization_mustKillJVM/history/]:
>   Consistent since build #85
> Env: CI only. Cannot repro locally



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to