[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14938199#comment-14938199
 ] 

Ryan McGuire edited comment on CASSANDRA-10403 at 9/30/15 6:54 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------

We enabled the use of different stress branches, so we should be able to run it 
now. 

I'll restart the job that benedict ran: 
http://cstar.datastax.com/tests/id/01b714d8-5f32-11e5-a4e4-42010af0688f 

I'll use [~benedict]'s stress branch from: 
https://github.com/belliottsmith/cassandra/tree/stress-report-interval

EDIT: test started: 
http://cstar.datastax.com/tests/id/ac36457a-67a0-11e5-8666-42010af0688f


was (Author: enigmacurry):
We enabled the use of different stress branches, so we should be able to run it 
now. 

I'll restart the job that benedict ran: 
http://cstar.datastax.com/tests/id/01b714d8-5f32-11e5-a4e4-42010af0688f 

I'll use [~benedict]'s stress branch from: 
https://github.com/belliottsmith/cassandra/tree/stress-report-interval

> Consider reverting to CMS GC on 3.0
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10403
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10403
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Config
>            Reporter: Joshua McKenzie
>            Assignee: Paulo Motta
>             Fix For: 3.0.0 rc2
>
>
> Reference discussion on CASSANDRA-7486.
> For smaller heap sizes G1 appears to have some throughput/latency issues when 
> compared to CMS. With our default max heap size at 8G on 3.0, there's a 
> strong argument to be made for having CMS as the default for the 3.0 release.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to