[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14953624#comment-14953624
 ] 

Adam Holmberg commented on CASSANDRA-10365:
-------------------------------------------

To be clear, I was thinking this would still be side-by-side with the pure cql 
representation, so hopefully the goal of server-side simplification could still 
be attained. (?)

> Consider storing types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of 
> fully-qualified internal class names
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10365
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
>            Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
>              Labels: client-impacting
>             Fix For: 3.0.0 rc2
>
>
> Consider saving CQL types names for column, UDF/UDA arguments and return 
> types, and UDT components.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to