[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15058992#comment-15058992 ]
Sandeep Tamhankar commented on CASSANDRA-10850: ----------------------------------------------- Yeah, I didn't make any assumptions regarding the answers to the outstanding questions, so I didn't change the text for those. Also, I didn't try this, but I presumed the process was that I was supposed to submit a patch, as opposed to trying to commit/push a branch and then submitting a PR. I'd be happy to go the push/PR route, assuming I have the appropriate permissions. > v4 spec has tons of grammatical mistakes > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-10850 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10850 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Documentation and Website > Reporter: Sandeep Tamhankar > Fix For: 3.0.2 > > Attachments: v4-protocol.patch > > > https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-3.0/doc/native_protocol_v4.spec > I notice the following in the first section of the spec and then gave up: > "The list of allowed opcode is defined Section 2.3" => "The list of allowed > opcode*s* is defined in Section 2.3" > "the details of each corresponding message is described Section 4" => "the > details of each corresponding message are described in Section 4" since the > subject is details, not message. > "Requests are those frame sent by" => "Requests are those frame*s* sent by" > I think someone should go through the whole spec and fix all the mistakes > rather than me pointing out the ones I notice piece-meal. I found the grammar > errors to be rather distracting. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)