[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marcus Eriksson updated CASSANDRA-11451:
----------------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 3.0.x)
                       (was: 2.2.x)
                       (was: 3.x)
                   3.5
                   3.0.5
                   2.2.6
           Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

committed, thanks

> Don't mark sstables as repairing when doing sub range repair
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11451
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11451
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
>            Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
>             Fix For: 2.2.6, 3.0.5, 3.5
>
>
> Since CASSANDRA-10422 we don't do anticompaction when a user issues a sub 
> range repair (-st X -et Y), but we still mark sstables as repairing.
> We should avoid marking them as users might want to run many sub range repair 
> sessions in parallel. 
> The reason we mark sstables is that we don't want another repair session to 
> steal the sstables before we do anticompaction, and since we do no 
> anticompaction with sub range repair we have no benefit from the marking.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to