[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15226056#comment-15226056
]
Alex Petrov commented on CASSANDRA-11339:
-----------------------------------------
I've added validation that would disallow any filtering queries. Non-filtering
queries (partition key locked ones, which is a bit senseless, even though
technically valid). Index queries also work. The tests for all cases, including
static columns and indexes are added.
|[trunk|https://github.com/ifesdjeen/cassandra/tree/11339-trunk]|
> WHERE clause in SELECT DISTINCT can be ignored
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-11339
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11339
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: CQL
> Reporter: Philip Thompson
> Assignee: Alex Petrov
> Fix For: 2.1.x
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-Add-validation-for-distinct-queries-disallowing-quer.patch
>
>
> I've tested this out on 2.1-head. I'm not sure if it's the same behavior on
> newer versions.
> For a given table t, with {{PRIMARY KEY (id, v)}} the following two queries
> return the same result:
> {{SELECT DISTINCT id FROM t WHERE v > X ALLOW FILTERING}}
> {{SELECT DISTINCT id FROM t}}
> The WHERE clause in the former is silently ignored, and all id are returned,
> regardless of the value of v in any row.
> It seems like this has been a known issue for a while:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26548788/select-distinct-cql-ignores-where-clause
> However, if we don't support filtering on anything but the partition key, we
> should reject the query, rather than silently dropping the where clause
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
