[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Stupp updated CASSANDRA-11972:
-------------------------------------
    Status: Patch Available  (was: In Progress)

Yea - maybe. Unsure after I've sorted out all the other stuff. Had the patch 
handy anyway. Wouldn't mind if it's considered not worth to commit.

||trunk|[branch|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...snazy:11972-bytes-in-header-trunk]|[testall|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/snazy/job/snazy-11972-bytes-in-header-trunk-testall/lastSuccessfulBuild/]|[dtest|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/snazy/job/snazy-11972-bytes-in-header-trunk-dtest/lastSuccessfulBuild/]


> Use byte[] instead of object tree in Frame.Header
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11972
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11972
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Robert Stupp
>            Assignee: Robert Stupp
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> Replacing the object tree/references in {{Frame.Header}} with {{byte[9]}} 
> saves a couple of object allocations. Also, not allocating the 9 bytes for 
> the header off-heap is less expensive.
> (will provide a patch soon)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to