[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15555978#comment-15555978 ]
Edward Capriolo edited comment on CASSANDRA-7296 at 10/7/16 7:05 PM: --------------------------------------------------------------------- {quote} Since there's little upside to this, and quite a bit of potential downside {quote} This is really useful if you want to do user generated request pinning. ONE could allow the node to proxy the request away based on what dynamic_snitch wants to do. {quote} New consistency levels tend to introduce a lot of edge-case bugs, and this one is particularly special, which probably means extra bugs. {quote} I am not following this logic. Because previously attempts which added buggy or incomplete features stand as a reason not to add new features? was (Author: appodictic): {quote} Since there's little upside to this, and quite a bit of potential downside {quote} This is really useful if you want to do user generated request pinning. ONE could allow the node to proxy the request away based on what dynamic_snitch wants to do. {quote} New consistency levels tend to introduce a lot of edge-case bugs, and this one is particularly special, which probably means extra bugs. {quote} I am not following this logic. Why does because previously attempts which added buggy or incomplete features stand as a reason not to add new features? > Add CL.COORDINATOR_ONLY > ----------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7296 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Tupshin Harper > > For reasons such as CASSANDRA-6340 and similar, it would be nice to have a > read that never gets distributed, and only works if the coordinator you are > talking to is an owner of the row. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)