[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15751659#comment-15751659
 ] 

Stefan Podkowinski commented on CASSANDRA-12859:
------------------------------------------------

This looks really promising. Just played around with your branch and it worked 
as expected for me.

Can you also update the documentation for syntax changes and examples? There's 
{{doc/cql3/CQL.textile}} ({{ant generate-cql-html}}) and 
{{doc/source/cql/security.rst}} that could use some hints how this works. 


> Column-level permissions
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-12859
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12859
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core, CQL
>            Reporter: Boris Melamed
>              Labels: doc-impacting
>         Attachments: Cassandra Proposal - Column-level permissions v2.docx, 
> Cassandra Proposal - Column-level permissions.docx
>
>   Original Estimate: 504h
>  Remaining Estimate: 504h
>
> h4. Here is a draft of: 
> Cassandra Proposal - Column-level permissions.docx (attached)
> h4. Quoting the 'Overview' section:
> The purpose of this proposal is to add column-level (field-level) permissions 
> to Cassandra. It is my intent to soon start implementing this feature in a 
> fork, and to submit a pull request once it’s ready.
> h4. Motivation
> Cassandra already supports permissions on keyspace and table (column family) 
> level. Sources:
> * http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/role-based-access-control-in-cassandra
> * https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/cql/security.html#data-control
> At IBM, we have use cases in the area of big data analytics where 
> column-level access permissions are also a requirement. All industry RDBMS 
> products are supporting this level of permission control, and regulators are 
> expecting it from all data-based systems.
> h4. Main day-one requirements
> # Extend CQL (Cassandra Query Language) to be able to optionally specify a 
> list of individual columns, in the {{GRANT}} statement. The relevant 
> permission types are: {{MODIFY}} (for {{UPDATE}} and {{INSERT}}) and 
> {{SELECT}}.
> # Persist the optional information in the appropriate system table 
> ‘system_auth.role_permissions’.
> # Enforce the column access restrictions during execution. Details:
> #* Should fit with the existing permission propagation down a role chain.
> #* Proposed message format when a user’s roles give access to the queried 
> table but not to all of the selected, inserted, or updated columns:
>   "User %s has no %s permission on column %s of table %s"
> #* Error will report only the first checked column. 
> Nice to have: list all inaccessible columns.
> #* Error code is the same as for table access denial: 2100.
> h4. Additional day-one requirements
> # Reflect the column-level permissions in statements of type 
> {{LIST ALL PERMISSIONS OF someuser;}}
> # When columns are dropped or renamed, trigger purging or adapting of their 
> permissions
> # Performance should not degrade in any significant way.
> # Backwards compatibility
> #* Permission enforcement for DBs created before the upgrade should continue 
> to work with the same behavior after upgrading to a version that allows 
> column-level permissions.
> #* Previous CQL syntax will remain valid, and have the same effect as before.
> h4. Documentation
> * 
> https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/cql/security.html#grammar-token-permission
> * Feedback request: any others?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to