[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098599#comment-16098599
 ] 

Branimir Lambov commented on CASSANDRA-7032:
--------------------------------------------

I can't think of a way to do such a reduction on an existing DC. Adding a new 
node with the same number of vnodes should improve the distribution of tokens 
within the DC, but adding one with e.g. 8 in a 256-vnode DC will just give it 
32-times smaller ownership. Trying to gradually transition will involve a 
period of severely overloading one or more of the non-converted nodes.

It looks like DC-by-DC is you best bet, unfortunately.

> Improve vnode allocation
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7032
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7032
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Branimir Lambov
>              Labels: performance, vnodes
>             Fix For: 3.0 alpha 1
>
>         Attachments: TestVNodeAllocation.java, TestVNodeAllocation.java, 
> TestVNodeAllocation.java, TestVNodeAllocation.java, TestVNodeAllocation.java, 
> TestVNodeAllocation.java
>
>
> It's been known for a little while that random vnode allocation causes 
> hotspots of ownership. It should be possible to improve dramatically on this 
> with deterministic allocation. I have quickly thrown together a simple greedy 
> algorithm that allocates vnodes efficiently, and will repair hotspots in a 
> randomly allocated cluster gradually as more nodes are added, and also 
> ensures that token ranges are fairly evenly spread between nodes (somewhat 
> tunably so). The allocation still permits slight discrepancies in ownership, 
> but it is bound by the inverse of the size of the cluster (as opposed to 
> random allocation, which strangely gets worse as the cluster size increases). 
> I'm sure there is a decent dynamic programming solution to this that would be 
> even better.
> If on joining the ring a new node were to CAS a shared table where a 
> canonical allocation of token ranges lives after running this (or a similar) 
> algorithm, we could then get guaranteed bounds on the ownership distribution 
> in a cluster. This will also help for CASSANDRA-6696.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to