[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011353#comment-13011353
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-1034:
-------------------------------------------
Initial feedback:
- I'm a fan of the RingPosition approach
- Less of a fan of pretending that Tokens and DK are equal if the token
component of DK is equal. Shouldn't we force caller to ask
Token.equals(DK.token) if that's what they mean? As you pointed out in RP
docstring, there is not an is-a relationship there.
- Should we add RP.isToken to encapsulate RP.asDecoratedKey.key == null checks?
- DK docstring is obsolete now
> Remove assumption that Key to Token is one-to-one
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-1034
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1034
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Stu Hood
> Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.8
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-Make-range-accept-both-Token-and-DecoratedKey.patch,
> 0002-LengthPartitioner.patch, 1034_v1.txt
>
>
> get_range_slices assumes that Tokens do not collide and converts a KeyRange
> to an AbstractBounds. For RandomPartitioner, this assumption isn't safe, and
> would lead to a very weird heisenberg.
> Converting AbstractBounds to use a DecoratedKey would solve this, because the
> byte[] key portion of the DecoratedKey can act as a tiebreaker.
> Alternatively, we could make DecoratedKey extend Token, and then use
> DecoratedKeys in places where collisions are unacceptable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
