[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16376627#comment-16376627 ]
Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-14260: ---------------------------------------------- For what it's worth, I would prefer moving out of using {{Pair}} all over the place and use specific classes instead. Just to illustrate, I'm talking of adding a {{SizeEstimate}} (or other name) with 2 fields {{partitionCount}} and {{meanSize}} for instance instead of the pair used for size estimates. I reckon this technically add a bit more lines of code over reusing a {{Pair}} class, but I feel it largely pay for itself in term of code clarity and error-proneness. If you get a {{LongLongPair}} from a method, you constantly have to double check which field is which, which I personally find annoying and is easy to mess up. Anyway, that remark obviously apply to all usage of {{Pair}} while I understand you intent here is just to avoid boxing, but in the off-change that there is agreement on the remarks above, I figured this may be a good occasion to start cleaning this up as well rather than add more "pair" classes. > Refactor pair to avoid boxing longs/ints > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-14260 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14260 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeff Jirsa > Assignee: Jeff Jirsa > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.x > > > We uses Pair<X,Y> all over the place, and in many cases either/both of X and > Y are primitives (ints, longs), and we end up boxing them into Integers and > Longs. We should have specialized versions that take primitives. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org